A Digital Age Deserves A Digital Leader

XP, you're still the one

Postby kanaloa » Tue Jun 17, 2008 6:34 pm

Cornflake wrote:Hell, give me Aero for XP and I'm set for life!


^*^ Well said. I feel the same way honestly.
"Greatness is not a function of circumstance. Greatness, it turns out, is largely a matter of conscious choice, and discipline." - Jim Collins
President
User avatar
Posts: 11795
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2002 1:18 am
Location: HI & SC
Real Name: John Derrick

Postby yeshuas » Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:22 pm

I was happy with Windows 3.11 for Workgroups, Windows 95 sucked and so did Windows 98 until second edition. Then along came another waste of disc space called Windows ME.
I like Windows XP, but I also like Vista even though it requires decent hardware, shoot I would have bought what hardware I bought anyway so that is not an issue for me. As far as hardware driver issues, I haven't had any to speak of.
Game Over!!!!!!!!
Image
ASUS Maximus V Gene MB
Windows 8 X64; Windows 7 X64; Windows 7 X86
Intel I5-3570K
16GB Corsair Vengeance Ram
eVGA GeForce GTX 550 TI
Corsair GS700 PS
1TB Seagate SATA 6.0Gb HD
Thermaltake Case
Software Development
User avatar
Posts: 5075
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:29 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Real Name: Daniel Schmidt

Postby nicksthegreat » Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:33 am

Well XP did get it chance, got accepted world wide by customers and vendors at the same time.
Not much of a resource hog. Service paks and updates were out regularly and the best part is compatibilty with hardware.

I havent used a Vista machine yet. I will have to soon though.

My opinion Vista wont even make it that list.

EDIT: I did like Windows 2000. It was quite easy to master. :yesnod:
Image
Cheers to mah man E-I-R-I-K :notworthy
PRO Level 12
User avatar
Posts: 549
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:40 am
Location: NZ

Postby kanaloa » Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:11 pm

2K was a little irritating to me until the later SP's because you had to make all your drivers work with your hardware. That's the one thing I loved about XP. It was a little bloated, but your stuff usually worked. My main gripe with XP (if not my only real gripe) is the way a local profile gets bogged down. Over time the profile becomes so full of junk it slows the PC way way down. A new profile will make you think you just purchased a totally different PC... it's fast and quick again.
"Greatness is not a function of circumstance. Greatness, it turns out, is largely a matter of conscious choice, and discipline." - Jim Collins
President
User avatar
Posts: 11795
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2002 1:18 am
Location: HI & SC
Real Name: John Derrick

Postby ginogsm » Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:46 pm

You can empty you local temp folder and you can set it that all the temp folders ( system and users' ) point to a folder other than the default. This happens on Vista too.

XP was a quantum leap ( as uncle Clive Sinclair used to call QL ) compared to 2K and one of the best characteristics was the Remote Desktops along with the plethora of drivers provided with the OS. It was fast and sleek , easy and beautiful. I loved XP when it came out and I was among the first who installed it. I loved the better than 2K kernel , and the better integration you cold achieve.
Image
<a href="http://www.vistamania.org/" target="_blank"><img src="http://parcom.pro-networks.org/images/vistamania35zu.gif" border="0"></a>
Image
PROfessional Member
User avatar
Posts: 4832
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 7:41 am
Location: Frankfurt , Germany
Real Name: George

Previous

Return to General Tech Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest