A Digital Age Deserves A Digital Leader

Which site is more accurate?

Forum rules
Welcome to our modest though robust team of folders! You are all more than welcome to join us or ask specific questions about how to go about folding but please start a new thread to post your questions, this way nothing of importance will be lost and everyone here will help you out.

If you just want to chat folding then the Folding@Home Home thread will be great!

Which site is more accurate?

Postby kd1966 » Sat Jan 24, 2009 7:12 pm

For folding stats I mean.... :question

The Stanford site or the Extreme Overclocking folding site?? And I lost my shortcut/bookmark for the Ext.OC site......grrr
PRO PLATINUM
User avatar
Posts: 6831
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 2:00 am
Location: USA - GSO - NC

Re: Which site is more accurate?

Postby augie » Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:30 pm

They are both accurate but the EOC site breaks it down into a more usable and understandable format.
Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves. -- Carl Jung

eVGA X58 tri-SLI, i7 930 @ 3.8GHz., Corsair 6GB Dominator, Inno3D GTX470, eVGA260
ASUS P8P67 Pro, i7 2600K @4.60 GHz, 8GB RAM, eVGA GTX 460
Community Director
User avatar
Posts: 7870
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 am
Location: Laurentians, Quebec

Re: Which site is more accurate?

Postby imnuts » Sun Jan 25, 2009 12:40 am

If you want the most up-to-date stats, go to the stanford site. If you don't care and what a more useful site for stats, EOC is better.
Image
PRO SUPREME
User avatar
Posts: 7457
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:19 am
Location: Boothwyn, Pennsylvania
Real Name: Mark

Return to Distributed Computing

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron
cron