Which site is more accurate?
Forum rules
Welcome to our modest though robust team of folders! You are all more than welcome to join us or ask specific questions about how to go about folding but please start a new thread to post your questions, this way nothing of importance will be lost and everyone here will help you out.
If you just want to chat folding then the Folding@Home Home thread will be great!
Welcome to our modest though robust team of folders! You are all more than welcome to join us or ask specific questions about how to go about folding but please start a new thread to post your questions, this way nothing of importance will be lost and everyone here will help you out.
If you just want to chat folding then the Folding@Home Home thread will be great!
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Which site is more accurate?
For folding stats I mean....
The Stanford site or the Extreme Overclocking folding site?? And I lost my shortcut/bookmark for the Ext.OC site......grrr
Re: Which site is more accurate?
They are both accurate but the EOC site breaks it down into a more usable and understandable format.
Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves. -- Carl Jung
eVGA X58 tri-SLI, i7 930 @ 3.8GHz., Corsair 6GB Dominator, Inno3D GTX470, eVGA260
ASUS P8P67 Pro, i7 2600K @4.60 GHz, 8GB RAM, eVGA GTX 460
eVGA X58 tri-SLI, i7 930 @ 3.8GHz., Corsair 6GB Dominator, Inno3D GTX470, eVGA260
ASUS P8P67 Pro, i7 2600K @4.60 GHz, 8GB RAM, eVGA GTX 460
- augie
- Community Director
- Posts: 7870
- Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 am
- Location: Laurentians, Quebec
Re: Which site is more accurate?
If you want the most up-to-date stats, go to the stanford site. If you don't care and what a more useful site for stats, EOC is better.
- imnuts
- Posts: 7457
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:19 am
- Location: Boothwyn, Pennsylvania
- Real Name: Mark
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to Distributed Computing
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests