Considering it... Unix and Apple on the Rise
Latest news, Help & Support, or discuss issues with *nix and Linspire systems.

Moderators: Management, Forum Experts

Considering it... Unix and Apple on the Rise

Postby kanaloa on Tue Jul 16, 2002 8:40 am

I've got to admit... I'm a die hard Windows fan, obviously, but my experiences with Linux lately have been nothing but fantastic. I've been amazed with the stability. I am very very interested in trying out Lindows now actually... it being the first real "user" or dummy, lol, friendly version of the *nix kernal. Just a thought... I know I've been impressed so far.

Another thing... while Apple's a huge competitor, I also have an interest in this Mac OS 9, or even 10.x "Jaguar."

I tell you people, we may all be die hard Windows fans, and it may well be the best OS out there, but unlike the days of yester-year some OS's are about to make a go at Windows and it's kingdom. I am actually looking forward to seeing where this goes.
"With realization of one's own potential and self-confidence in one's ability, one can build a better world." -Dalai Lama
Image

Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/JCDerrick
User avatar
kanaloa
President
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2002 9:18 pm
Location: Columbia, SC
Real Name: John Derrick

Postby Weaver on Tue Jul 16, 2002 11:58 am

I definitely agree with you. The main issue when it comes to windows vs. linux for me is security.

Let's pretend you and I are burglars, I tell him. We're considering breaking into two houses. We have the blueprint for the first house, let's call it the Open Source house. We know how the house is laid out, we know where the doors are, but we also know that there are locks on the windows, there are dead-bolt locks on all the doors, there's a burglar alarm installed, there are two 100-pound Rottweilers living inside, and the owner keeps a loaded double-barrel shotgun somewhere in the house. Let's call the second house the Microsoft house. We don't have a blueprint, but we know the owner doesn't have locks on the windows, has no dogs, guns, or burglar alarm, and tends to leave the back door unlocked.

-Grant Gross of Newsforge while interviewing Kent Brown, author of a white paper saying Open Source software makes government computer systems susceptible to terrorist attack. Mr. Brown was unable to retort to Mr. Gross's excellent analogy being summed up with "Which house would you burglarize?"

-Weaver
Public Keys

The primary purpose of the DATA statement is to give names to constants; instead of referring to pi as 3.141592653589793 at every appearance, the variable PI can be given that value with a DATA statement and used instead of the longer form of the constant. This also simplifies modifying the program, should the value of pi change.
-- FORTRAN manual for Xerox Computers
User avatar
Weaver
PROfessional Member
 
Posts: 2240
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2002 8:05 pm
Location: /home/weaver/

Postby epec254 on Tue Jul 16, 2002 6:53 pm

I get to admin a Mac lab next year, so I can (hopefully) be one of our Apple support people :)
VP - Technology
epec254
VP - Technology
 
Posts: 1702
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2002 9:31 am
Location: USA

Postby kanaloa on Tue Jul 16, 2002 6:58 pm

Sweet... that would be awesome.
"With realization of one's own potential and self-confidence in one's ability, one can build a better world." -Dalai Lama
Image

Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/JCDerrick
User avatar
kanaloa
President
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2002 9:18 pm
Location: Columbia, SC
Real Name: John Derrick

Postby purplehawk on Tue Jul 16, 2002 8:13 pm

This whole debate is over my head, guys. Cliff has mentioned turning my current Bessie into a Linux server once we launch the New and Improved and Super-Fast Bessie next month. I would be lost, though. There was a world before Windows, I realize that, but it's hard to remember, LOL!
purplehawk
 

Postby Shack on Wed Jul 17, 2002 9:58 am

People people the only reason Linux is so secure is because not that much has been written to hack it yet , its not because it has some built in security shield. Not enough people use it to warrant someone hacking it. You can bet the more popular and wide spread it gets someone somewhere will figure out how to hack it. If it ever hopes to become mainstream things will have to streamlined so an average Joe can install it. When that happens corners start being cut security vulnerabilitys are built in and bingo you got windows :lol: :lol:

As for virus's the more popular it gets the more likely it will be that someone will start writing virus for Linux, virus for Star Office , virus for Mozilla and so on and so an :P



ImageShack
Image



A television may insult your intelligence , but nothing rubs it in like a computer

Facism will come the this country wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross "Sinclair Lewis"
User avatar
Shack
PROfessional Member
 
Posts: 377
Joined: Thu Mar 21, 2002 3:39 pm
Location: Michigan,Winter,Water,Wonderland

Postby Weaver on Wed Jul 17, 2002 5:48 pm

You do raise a valid point as to why linux is so secure. You fail to hit on a key point. Well a hundred key points actually.

Firstly, linux, well linux that I use, Slackware, Debian... is not designed to be user friendly. No, I am not one of your run of the mill Linux knobs who thinks he is better than WINDOWS users because he can configure from a command prompt. Back to my point, since Linux is *not* very user friendly, a lot of the functionality intended for *user friendliness* can be removed. More time is spent on a user friendly interface than actually securing the program.

Now I am by no means saying that friendly interface is a bad thing. I like having all kind of options available just by right clicking... But the fact that a trouble free UI undermines security is unacceptable.

Just my two cents.

-Weaver
Public Keys

The primary purpose of the DATA statement is to give names to constants; instead of referring to pi as 3.141592653589793 at every appearance, the variable PI can be given that value with a DATA statement and used instead of the longer form of the constant. This also simplifies modifying the program, should the value of pi change.
-- FORTRAN manual for Xerox Computers
User avatar
Weaver
PROfessional Member
 
Posts: 2240
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2002 8:05 pm
Location: /home/weaver/

Postby purplehawk on Wed Jul 17, 2002 7:37 pm

I am probably the epitome of what "user-friendly interface" was intended for. I can now do a lot of stuff inside Windows, thanks mostly to the kind old dudes on this site who've taught me enough to be highly dangerous in a Windows environment. I don't doubt for a minute I could learn to use Linux, but the question is whether or not it's worth the effort.

The majority of the people around me find Windows mind-boggling. My sister, for example, wants to logon to her PC, do whatever she wishes to do and have it all work right without any interaction on her part, and then turn the thing off. What in God's name would she do with Linux? Her son came over one day last year to work on a school project that required my grandson's iMac. I had to stop what I was doing and walk them through every keystroke, literally.

She recently upgraded to a 2.2GHz XP machine and is still loathe to admit how much she likes XP. Even so, she screwed it all up by installing AOL. Said she couldn't live without hearing "You've Got Mail."
purplehawk
 


Return to Unix & Linux

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests