Post new topic    Reply to topic
Login to print this topic
Author Message
Grav!ty
Graham Massey
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 10:45 pm Reply with quote

Vice President
Operations
 
 


Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Posts: 20783
Location: Johannesburg
Microsoft e-mails reveal Intel pressure over Vista

February 28, 2008
By Tom Krazit


As far back as 2005, Microsoft executives knew that confusing hardware requirements for the Windows Vista Capable program might get them in trouble. But they did it anyway--over the objection of PC makers--at the behest of Intel, according to e-mails released as part of a class-action lawsuit pending against Microsoft.

In early 2006, Intel's Renee James, vice president and general manager of Intel's software and solutions group, was able to prevail on Microsoft's Will Poole to change the proposed requirements for Microsoft's proposed "Vista Ready" marketing program to include an older integrated graphics chipset that couldn't run Vista's Aero interface. At the time, Intel was worried that it wouldn't be able to ship the more advanced 945 chispet, which was capable of running Aero, in step with Microsoft's proposed schedule for the introduction of the marketing upgrade plan.

This led to the creation of the "Vista Capable" logo, which is the reason Microsoft is now in court, facing a class-action lawsuit on the part of PC owners who bought so-called Vista Capable machines in late 2006 only to find those machines could only run Vista Basic, which doesn't feature the Aero interface. The potential for confusion was well-understood both outside the company, as noted here in this CNET News.com story from March 2006, and within the company, as multiple e-mail threads reveal.

A treasure trove of e-mails has been released as part of that case, and the Seattle Post-Intelligencer's Todd Bishop has spotlighted a number of e-mails that call into question whether Microsoft was acting, at least in part, on Intel's behalf when it set the requirements for the Vista Capable marketing program. Several pages of e-mails were redacted by the court. All e-mails quoted in this report were taken verbatim, typos and all, from a PDF file put together by the Seattle Post-Intelligencer in a blog posted by Bishop yesterday.

"In the end, we lowered the requirement to help Intel make their quarterly earnings so they could continue to sell motherboards with the 915 graphics embedded," Microsoft's John Kalkman wrote in a February 2007 e-mail to Scott Di Valerio, who at the time managed Microsoft's relationships with the PC companies and recently took a job with Lenovo. The change took place in January 2006, and was formally rolled out by Poole, currently corporate vice president of Microsoft's unlimited potential group, without the knowledge of Jim Allchin, the now-departed Microsoft executive who was supposed to be in charge of Vista's development


More at: CNET News


_______________
Disclaimer: The views expressed by the authors of articles posted as well as by members, do not necessarily reflect those of PROnetworks. All posts are monitored by our Moderators and Administrators and those deemed unacceptable will be removed. Should you strongly object to any item and can support your objection with reasons, please feel free to PM a member of the PROnetworks Staff with your concerns.
 
Back to top
Grav!ty
Graham Massey
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 10:55 pm Reply with quote

Vice President
Operations
 
 


Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Posts: 20783
Location: Johannesburg
Corporate ethics just plain suck in my opinion. Intel seems to push the envelope every opportunity it gets, this being one example and the other the way in which it paid kickbacks or lowered prices to CPU distributers if they didn't distribute AMD components.
 
Back to top
Cornflake
PostPosted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 1:11 am Reply with quote

PRO Level 15
 
 


Joined: 29 Jul 2005
Posts: 1291
Location: Colorado, USA
IMHO I wished that Intel integrated chipsets stayed "non-aero capable". Integrated chipsets should be done away with this day in age (Except for ATi and nVidia's integrated ones, they're halfway decent). And if you're a business person looking for a think notebook with long battery life (the most likely ones to get an integrated chipset), you wouldn't be running Aero anyway.
 
Back to top
JabbaPapa
Julian Lord
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:28 pm Reply with quote

Respected Member
of PROnetworks
 
 


Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 14272
Location: Monte-Carlo
Yeah, I remember at the time when they revealed the specs for "Vista-capable" PCs, and it was blindingly obvious to the Staff and Windows Experts who were here at PRO at the time, that it was a horrible compromise.

---

I am disgusted, and not at all surprised, at Intel for the damage they have done to the public image of Vista.

---

This is just another example of why I will never purchase an Intel CPU / chipset / whatever...
 
Back to top
JabbaPapa
Julian Lord
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:34 pm Reply with quote

Respected Member
of PROnetworks
 
 


Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 14272
Location: Monte-Carlo
But it's not just Intel unfortunately --- I have a fully "Vista-ready" Turion64 X2 laptop, from Acer, and installing the Vista x64 is nightmarish because the manufacturer, contrary to the "Vista-ready" specs, has failed to provide any proper x64 drivers packages...
 
Back to top
Back to top
Index >> Miscellaneous Tech Talk >> Intel pushed Microsoft for sub-standard "Vista Ready" PC's

Page 1 of 1

Post new topic   Reply to topic


Tired of the Ads? Registered users have 80% less adverts.