Attention: PROnetworks has upgraded our forum from phpbb2 to phpbb3!!

Please head over to our new converted forum at: http://www.pronetworks.org/forums/

This old forum will remain 'read-only' until approximately February 2009. We look forward to seeing you at the new forum!
Author Message
phileysmiley
Larry Richman
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 3:02 pm Reply with quote

Media Director
 
 


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 37439
Location: Philadelphia PA USA
lord of the ringsJackson back in 'Hobbit' via NL, MGM
Jackson to exec produce after dispute settlement
By Gregg Goldstein
Dec 19, 2007

NEW YORK -- The eagerly awaited prequels to the "Lord of the Rings" trilogy will finally hit the big screen. GM and New Line have pacted to co-finance and co-distribute "The Hobbit" and a sequel to the film. New Line will handle distribution in North America, and MGM will distribute the J.R.R. Tolkien adaptations internationally.

Putting aside what once seemed like irreconcilable differences over the filmmaker's profit participation, "Rings" writer-director Peter Jackson and New Line have settled all litigation over the nearly $3 billion-grossing "Rings" trilogy. Jackson and Fran Walsh will executive produce the films, to be shot simultaneously, and New Line will manage their production.

Preproduction will begin soon, and principal photography is tentatively set for 2009. The release of the first film is slated for 2010 and the sequel in 2011. Jackson, MGM chairman and CEO Harry Sloan and New Line co-chairman and co-CEOs Bob Shaye and Michael Lynne jointly made the announcement Tuesday morning.

"I'm very pleased that we've been able to put our differences behind us, so that we may begin a new chapter with our old friends at New Line," Jackson said. " 'The Lord of the Rings' is a legacy we proudly share with Bob and Michael, and together, we share that legacy with millions of loyal fans all over the world. We are delighted to continue our journey through Middle Earth. I also want to thank Harry Sloan and our new friends at MGM for helping us find the common ground necessary to continue that journey."
The Hollywood Reporter
complete article
 
Back to top
augie
Algis Koscus
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 3:27 pm Reply with quote

Community Director
 
 


Joined: 25 Aug 2002
Posts: 17725
Location: Laurentians, Quebec
That's good to hear, except for the timeline. There was the animated musical IIRC and not much else. Should be good if the same standards are upheld.smile
 
Back to top
augie
Algis Koscus
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 3:58 pm Reply with quote

Community Director
 
 


Joined: 25 Aug 2002
Posts: 17725
Location: Laurentians, Quebec
BTW, where's the second one coming from as The Hobbit was a pretty thin book, perhaps Silmarillion? I have no clue at the moment.
 
Back to top
phileysmiley
Larry Richman
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:03 pm Reply with quote

Media Director
 
 


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 37439
Location: Philadelphia PA USA
augie wrote:
BTW, where's the second one coming from as The Hobbit was a pretty thin book, perhaps Silmarillion? I have no clue at the moment.

Basically they are just going to split The Hobbitt in two.
 
Back to top
augie
Algis Koscus
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:33 pm Reply with quote

Community Director
 
 


Joined: 25 Aug 2002
Posts: 17725
Location: Laurentians, Quebec
phileysmiley wrote:
augie wrote:
BTW, where's the second one coming from as The Hobbit was a pretty thin book, perhaps Silmarillion? I have no clue at the moment.

Basically they are just going to split The Hobbitt in two.


Hmm, OK makes some sense now and The Hobbit weighs in at 358 pages, I must have been thinking of something else. oops Still, two movies seems somewhat excessive to me. Ye old dollar comes to mind.sad
 
Back to top
JabbaPapa
Julian Lord
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 3:05 am Reply with quote

PROfessional Member
 
 


Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 14318
Location: Monte-Carlo
phileysmiley wrote:
augie wrote:
BTW, where's the second one coming from as The Hobbit was a pretty thin book, perhaps Silmarillion? I have no clue at the moment.

Basically they are just going to split The Hobbitt in two.


In fact, the first film will be The Hobbit, and the second film will be both a sequel to The Hobbit, and a prequel to LOTR smilenod --- using material gleaned mostly from the Appendices in the Return Of The King (the book), but I would suspect also from the posthumous works by JRRT covering this period.
 
Back to top
augie
Algis Koscus
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 11:19 am Reply with quote

Community Director
 
 


Joined: 25 Aug 2002
Posts: 17725
Location: Laurentians, Quebec
JabbaPapa wrote:
phileysmiley wrote:
augie wrote:
BTW, where's the second one coming from as The Hobbit was a pretty thin book, perhaps Silmarillion? I have no clue at the moment.

Basically they are just going to split The Hobbitt in two.


In fact, the first film will be The Hobbit, and the second film will be both a sequel to The Hobbit, and a prequel to LOTR smilenod --- using material gleaned mostly from the Appendices in the Return Of The King (the book), but I would suspect also from the posthumous works by JRRT covering this period.


Now there's an idea, I totally forgot about the appendices and there is a lot of material there.
 
Back to top
phileysmiley
Larry Richman
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 3:43 pm Reply with quote

Media Director
 
 


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 37439
Location: Philadelphia PA USA
augie wrote:
JabbaPapa wrote:
phileysmiley wrote:
augie wrote:
BTW, where's the second one coming from as The Hobbit was a pretty thin book, perhaps Silmarillion? I have no clue at the moment.

Basically they are just going to split The Hobbitt in two.


In fact, the first film will be The Hobbit, and the second film will be both a sequel to The Hobbit, and a prequel to LOTR smilenod --- using material gleaned mostly from the Appendices in the Return Of The King (the book), but I would suspect also from the posthumous works by JRRT covering this period.


Now there's an idea, I totally forgot about the appendices and there is a lot of material there.

Aha! I hadn't been able to find those details anywhere. Thanks! thumbsup
 
Back to top
JabbaPapa
Julian Lord
PostPosted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 5:47 pm Reply with quote

PROfessional Member
 
 


Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 14318
Location: Monte-Carlo
Whatever --- just so long as we get to see some more of Ian McKellan and Christopher Lee tongue
 
Back to top
Back to top
Index >> Multimedia Warehouse >> "Lord Of The Rings" Prequels To Hit Screen

Page 1 of 1

 


Tired of the Ads? Registered users have 80% less adverts.