Attention: PROnetworks has upgraded our forum from phpbb2 to phpbb3!!

Please head over to our new converted forum at: http://www.pronetworks.org/forums/

This old forum will remain 'read-only' until approximately February 2009. We look forward to seeing you at the new forum!
Author Message
JazzX
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2004 9:36 am Reply with quote

PRO New Member
 
 


Joined: 23 Apr 2004
Posts: 7
Location: The Nasal Midwest
I'm looking at replacing my CD-RW drive with a DVD burner...what's the difference between the -R and the +R suffixes?
 
Back to top
smileyface
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2004 10:12 am Reply with quote

PRO New Member
 
 


Joined: 27 May 2004
Posts: 3
Location: Canada
okay the DVD-R and +R is the technolgies used by the dvd burner i guess what you need to know is whic one should i buy and why
If you get the dvd-r you can burn 4.7GB dvds and you need to buy a blank dvd-r for this

if you buy dvd+r you can burn higher capacity dvd's but you cant use dvd-r blank cds for this only you can use dvd+r

if you buy DVD-+r you can do both ----watch out this option is very expensive
 
Back to top
glexp
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2004 10:14 am Reply with quote

PROfessional Member
 
 


Joined: 30 Jun 2002
Posts: 501
Location: California
Here's a link (and more) on DVD nomenclature:
http://www.videohelp.com/dvd

Enjoy, GP
 
Back to top
imnuts
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2004 10:22 am Reply with quote

Support Team
 
 


Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 14585
Location: Boothwyn, Pennsylvania
actually dual format burners are starting to get pretty cheap. there are even one's available for less than $80.
 
Back to top
JCARES
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2004 1:38 pm Reply with quote

PRO Level 2
 
 


Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 31
Location: Mexico
Yeah Dual Formats DVD -/+ R (W) are cheap, check out the Liteon's DVD Burners
www.liteonit.com

I have a Pioneer A07U it's a very high quality dual dvd burner and... CHEAP!


JC smilenod
 
Back to top
JazzX
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2004 2:03 pm Reply with quote

PRO New Member
 
 


Joined: 23 Apr 2004
Posts: 7
Location: The Nasal Midwest
Well, thanks for all your replies and information! Guess I need to start burner-hunting... smilenod
 
Back to top
imnuts
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2004 2:12 pm Reply with quote

Support Team
 
 


Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 14585
Location: Boothwyn, Pennsylvania
i would start at newegg.com some of the best prices anywhere
 
Back to top
jamba
PostPosted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 6:48 pm Reply with quote

PRO New Member
 
 


Joined: 17 May 2004
Posts: 6
Location: East Bay Area, CA
I did extensive research on both formats about 2-3 years ago because I didn't want to get stuck with the modern day "Betamax", (Yes, I still have one and a ton of movies too.)

The main difference I found was that the + format didn't need to be finalized, meaning write and rewrite times were reduced. I found compatability to be a give and take between both formats. - would work in dvd x but, not in y, while + wouldn't work in x, but would work in y. Personally, I think compatability is a none issue if you've got a newer dvd drive/player.

I settled on + believing it would win out over -, then the combo drives came out. Now, I'd just buy a combo drive. I do remember reading somewhere, however, that - actually has a, "speed limit". Meaning it will top out at 8x, maybe it was higher, while + didn't have this problem and has higher potential in the speed department. Also - engineers were having a harder/slower time increasing write speed than their + counterparts.

If you really want to do some research check this:

http://www.dvddemystified.com/dvdfaq.html#4.3.6

I used these sites during my research too:

http://www.dvdplusrw.org

http://www.dvdrw.com

Guess I was kinda leaning in the plus direction from the get go.
 
Back to top
OsirisX
PostPosted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 7:08 pm Reply with quote

PROfessional Member
 
 


Joined: 29 Dec 2003
Posts: 12927
Location: USA, CT
I'm sure that the - must must have some advantages that + doesn't or there would even be a battle.
 
Back to top
jamba
PostPosted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 7:33 pm Reply with quote

PRO New Member
 
 


Joined: 17 May 2004
Posts: 6
Location: East Bay Area, CA
UnknownDarknessX wrote:
I'm sure that the - must must have some advantages that + doesn't or there would even be a battle.


True, it did. At the time +r didn't exist yet, only +rw, which wasn't as compatable as -r/rw. With the introduction of +r the compatablity issue become moot, in my view anyway, with -r/rw being slightly more compatable, (Around 3-5% I think). Compatablility becomes even less of an issue if you've got a newer player which will more than likely be compliant with either format.

The other benefit noted by the - side was blank media cost. 3 years ago -media was considerably less expensive. Today they're the same price, $25 for 2 25 packs, either - or +.

Like others have said, I'd go combo just to hedge my bet.
 
Back to top
Back to top
Index >> Hardware and Computer Customizing Center >> DVD -R and DVD +R...what's the difference?

Goto page 1, 2  Next

Page 1 of 2

 


Tired of the Ads? Registered users have 80% less adverts.