|
|
|
SonicSpeed
Brian Lawhorn |
Posted:
Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:31 pm |
|
|
|
PRO BRONZE
Joined: 07 Jun 2004
Posts: 3472
Location: Oregon, 'or-i-g&n
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
Sisco22
|
Posted:
Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:51 pm |
|
|
|
PRO Level 15
Joined: 29 Mar 2004
Posts: 1078
Location: Nashville, TN
|
it looks exactly like Vista. *sighs* probably gonna act like Vista too 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
SonicSpeed
Brian Lawhorn |
Posted:
Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:58 pm |
|
|
|
PRO BRONZE
Joined: 07 Jun 2004
Posts: 3472
Location: Oregon, 'or-i-g&n
|
| Sisco22 wrote: |
it looks exactly like Vista. *sighs* probably gonna act like Vista too  |
Actually I just heard from a forum member on a different forum that these are fakes, so I'm inclined to believe him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
Sisco22
|
Posted:
Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:59 pm |
|
|
|
PRO Level 15
Joined: 29 Mar 2004
Posts: 1078
Location: Nashville, TN
|
|
i believe that as well. that is vista. plain and simple.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
jaelanicu
|
Posted:
Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:56 pm |
|
|
|
PRO Level 9
Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 383
Location: Indonesia
|
A chinese using a French version of Windows? That's odd.
Windows 7 version number should have been 7.x.x.x rather than 6.x.x.x. Only Vista uses version number 6.x.x.x. I know that Vista Gold version is 6.0.x.x, but I don't know about Vista SP1. Anyone have info for this?
IMO, if Vista SP1 version number is 6.1.x.x, then that Windows 7 is a hacked Vista SP1 version. Or an image-edited screenshots of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
augie
Algis Koscus |
Posted:
Thu Jan 24, 2008 3:35 pm |
|
|
|
Management Community Discussion
Joined: 25 Aug 2002
Posts: 17491
Location: Laurentians, Quebec
|
|
I have Vista SP1 refresh on and besides the evaluation copy blurb on the bottom right, all I can find is in the detalis is Vista Service Pack 1 v.668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
JabbaPapa
Julian Lord |
Posted:
Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:29 pm |
|
|
|
Respected Member of PROnetworks
Joined: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 14263
Location: Monte-Carlo
|
Yeah, the build number is VERY suspicious
Possibly, this entire story is fake from A to Z ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
jaelanicu
|
Posted:
Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:29 pm |
|
|
|
PRO Level 9
Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 383
Location: Indonesia
|
| augie wrote: |
| I have Vista SP1 refresh on and besides the evaluation copy blurb on the bottom right, all I can find is in the detalis is Vista Service Pack 1 v.668 |
Could you tell me the file/product version number of the NTDLL.DLL or KERNEL32.DLL file from its properties dialog (Version tab)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
augie
Algis Koscus |
Posted:
Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:51 pm |
|
|
|
Management Community Discussion
Joined: 25 Aug 2002
Posts: 17491
Location: Laurentians, Quebec
|
| jaelanicu wrote: |
| augie wrote: |
| I have Vista SP1 refresh on and besides the evaluation copy blurb on the bottom right, all I can find is in the detalis is Vista Service Pack 1 v.668 |
Could you tell me the file/product version number of the NTDLL.DLL or KERNEL32.DLL file from its properties dialog (Version tab)? |
I only found Kernel32.DLL which is in System32 folder: 6.0.6001.17052. The Ntdll.DLL is there somewhere but I couldn't find where it lives. I hope that's enough info.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
SonicSpeed
Brian Lawhorn |
Posted:
Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:55 pm |
|
|
|
PRO BRONZE
Joined: 07 Jun 2004
Posts: 3472
Location: Oregon, 'or-i-g&n
|
| JabbaPapa wrote: |
Yeah, the build number is VERY suspicious
Possibly, this entire story is fake from A to Z ... |
Well we know at least there was a M1 release. But besides that, the only other thing that we know is that the build is most likely 6519. If its 6.1.6519 or 7.0.6519, we still don't know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|